Eurodad logo
Eurodad logo

Debt in the downturn

01 October 2009

Developing country debt is once again high on the agenda of policymakers and the international financial institutions. The global financial crisis has hit developing countries hard: a sharp contraction in global demand, volatile commodity prices, lower levels of migrant remittances, uncertain levels of official development assistance, increased spreads on sovereign bonds and lower levels of affordable capital have all combined to significantly worsen the budgetary position of many governments. In 2009 alone, the shortfall in external financing is estimated at between US$350 and US$635 billion.

Billions of dollars in new loans are being thrown at the problem and the G20 has given the international financial institutions a central role in delivering this money. An additional US$500 billion in resources has been funnelled to the IMF. Since the outbreak of the crisis, the institution has provided US$170 billion in new loans to 32 countries. The World Bank has also increased its lending activities by 54% over the previous year. To justify its stepped-up official lending programme, rich country governments have pressed the World Bank and IMF to re-write their rules on debt sustainability. The Bank and Fund have re-cast the debt sustainability framework for low-income countries to allow countries to take-on more debt without them being considered in debt ‘distress’. The new rules overlook certain state liabilities and rely on migrant remittances as an additional way to pay back sovereign debt.

This policy response will store-up significant debt problems for countries in the future. Already there are concerns that some impoverished countries are at moderate or high risk of debt distress mainly due to export and income shortfalls, as well as the impact of currency devaluations. The debt-to-GDP ratios of 28 low-income countries already exceed 60%. This is more than double the number in this situation before the outbreak of the global recession. UNCTAD points to serious concerns over the debt burden in 49 least developed countries.

Developing countries were not responsible for the current global economic downturn. And yet, they are being forced to indebt themselves further to meet rising demand for social spending. A moratorium on external debt service payments would be a more just and effective way to release extra funds for critical investments in poverty reduction and economic growth. EURODAD has calculated that a two year moratorium on external debt service payments for 64 of the world’s poorest countries would release over US$30.5 billion in extra finance.

Providing new loans to countries to help them meet temporary shortfalls in external finance only addresses the symptoms, not the cause, of why many countries retain a chronic dependence on foreign credit. One reason is the massive illicit capital outflows from developing countries, estimated at around US$1 trillion every year. In addition, an estimated US$105-180 billion in so-called ‘stolen assets’ from developing countries are hidden away in rich country banks. Recognition of the problem is growing but international efforts to crack down on tax evasion, curb capital flight and repatriate stolen wealth need to be dramatically scaled-up.

With or without a debt sustainability framework, there will always be cases when countries run into sovereign debt difficulties or have serious allegations of illegitimate debt. A fair and transparent debt arbitration procedure, as advocated in EURODAD’s Charter on Responsible Finance, must be introduced to deal with these cases. In the last year policymakers have found several new ways to address corporate debt. It is now time to propose new approaches for sovereign debt.

EURODAD welcomes comments on the proposals tabled in this discussion paper until end-October 2009. EURODAD will then organise a discussion among members on the basis of inputs received and will publish a final version in November 2009. Please send your views to ghurley[at]eurodad.org 

Rapports.

derniers rapports

13 November 2008:  - Multilateral debt - International Financial Institutions
Quels sont les points communs du Ghana et de la Tanzanie?

08 October 2008:  - Aid effectiveness
Reality of Aid dénonce l’inertie des rapports d’aide entre pays

28 August 2008:  - Financial architecture - Illegitimate debt - Aid effectiveness
Dresser les Vautours: Les Nouvelles Mesures Suffiront- Elles Pour Proteger les Gains des Allegements de Dette?

26 August 2008:  - Aid effectiveness
Lettre d’information « Reality Check » : Les programmes verticaux internationaux ou la prolifération des fonds d’aide

22 May 2008:  - Conditionality - Aid effectiveness - Aid accounting
Pas de temps à perdre: les gouvernements européens sont en retard sur la quantité et la qualité de l’aide

08 May 2008:  - Capital Flight
Fiche d’information d’Eurodad : La fuite des capitaux détourne le financement du développement

08 May 2008:  - Capital Flight
Le trou noir du développement : De la nécessité de réguler la fuite des capitaux

06 May 2008:  - Aid effectiveness - Conditionality
La CE, fer de lance d’un soutien budgétaire de qualité

22 April 2008:  - Aid effectiveness
Changer la donne: L’aide et la responsabilité dans le cadre de la Déclaration de Paris

09 April 2008:  - Conditionality
Des conditions controversées : Le FMI maintient son emprise sur les gouvernements à faible revenu

05 March 2008:  - Financial architecture - Debt sustainability - Illegitimate debt
Charte d'Eurodad pour des prêts responsables

22 November 2007:  - Bilateral debt
Conversions de dette pour le développement. Réponse créative ou voile de fumée?

09 November 2007:  - Aid effectiveness
Lier analyse budgétaire et plaidoyer en faveur de l'aide

11 May 2007:  - Aid accounting
Retenez vos applaudissements ! Les gouvernements de l’UE risquent de ne pas tenir leurs engagements en matière d’aide

27 April 2007:  - Bilateral debt
La politique belge en matière d'annulations de dette de pays pauvres

20 April 2007:  - Illegitimate debt
Pourquoi la Norvège prend ses responsabilités de créancier - L'affaire de la campagne d'exportation des navires

08 February 2007:  - Illegitimate debt - Bilateral debt
Des squelettes dans le placard: les demandes de remboursements des dettes illégitimes du G7

10 January 2007:  - Debt sustainability - Financial architecture
Soutenabilité de la dette ou dissuasion défensive? L'émergence de nouveaux créanciers et la riposte des anciens.

27 June 2006:  - Multilateral debt
Un An après l’Accord du G8 sur la Dette : Quel Bilan ? Et maintenant ?

26 June 2006:  - Financial architecture
La loi des créanciers contre les droits des citoyens

01 June 2006:  - Conditionality
La conditionnalité de la Banque Mondiale et du FMI : une injustice pour le développement

30 January 2006:  - Multilateral debt
Justice pour l'Amérique latine: annulations de dettes envers la BID

30 January 2006:  - Multilateral debt - Debt sustainability
Justice pour les dettes de l'Amerique Latine

19 January 2006:  - International Financial Institutions
Le "modèle tchadien": chronique d'un désastre annoncé!

01 November 2005:  - Poverty analysis and strategies
Conférence électronique d’Eurodad sur les analyses d’impact sur la pauvreté et le social

15 September 2005:  - Financial architecture - Poverty analysis and strategies
Les études d'impact en ligne de mire

14 September 2005:  - Debt sustainability - International Financial Institutions
Encore et toujours à côté de la plaque... Les dessous du nouveau cadre de soutenabilité de la banque Mondiale et du FMI

26 July 2005:  - Multilateral debt - Conditionality
Mis au purgatoire, mis au frigo: la situation actuelle de quelques pays PPTE se trouvant au point de décision

16 June 2005:  - Multilateral debt
Détails machiavéliques: les implications de la proposition du G7 sur la dette

20 April 2005:  - Aid overview
Les défis de la reconstruction économique en R. D. Congo

20 April 2005:  - Poverty analysis and strategies
La stratégie DSRP-PPTE en R. D. Congo

30 March 2005:  - Multilateral debt
Les propositions du gouvernement britannique pour l’annulation de la dette multilatérale